An Evaluation of the Performance of the United Nations Essay

Abstraction

The United Nations is the most dominant international governmental organisation in the universe. Having been formed with the chief aim of forestalling war instantly after World War II. so far it appears to hold had small success in making so. Yet there are many jobs that are planetary in nature and therefore depend on the United Nations to turn to them. This has prompted examination into the activities and personal businesss of the United Nations with the purpose of measuring the strengths and failings of the organisation. This survey takes a critical expression into the constructions and duties of the political and security variety meats of the United Nations with the purpose of placing failings and doing proposals on how better on the public presentation of the organisation.

Chapter I – Introduction

Introductory paragraphs

The challenge of insecurity in international dealingss remains one of the biggest menaces confronting the universe today. Despite legion spirited attempts by states throughout the universe to procure the international system from the of all time skulking dangers of international wars. the rule of corporate security remains every bit elusive as of all time.

Since the formation of the United Nations ( UN ) in 1945. the international system has obviously been characterized by legion security challenges that have peculiarly been defined by events during the Cold War. after the Cold War and after the September 11 2001 terrorist act onslaughts upon the United States. With the foundation of the United Nations holding been solidly based on the rules of corporate security. there are increasing concerns as to whether the United Nations is populating up to its charge.

Past events have clearly demonstrated that the United Nations lacks equal capacity and authorization to implement the rule of corporate security. Harmonizing to Goldstein ( 2003 ) . “The UN Charter establishes a mechanism for corporate security – the stria together of the world’s states to halt an attacker ( p. 267 ) . Chapter 7 of the Charter explicitly authorizes the Security Council to utilize military force against aggression if the usage of non-violent agencies as captured in chapter 6 fail. Harmonizing to the UN Charter. the United Nations may step in domestically in a province that commits Acts of the Apostless of aggression or airss menaces to security.

However. this rule is normally enforced selectively. Analysis by Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) showed that because great states possess veto powers. the UN can non sharply stop aggression by ( or supported by ) a great power. Therefore. Chapter seven was used one time during the Cold War – in the Korean War when the Soviet deputation foolishly boycotted the Security Council proceedings ( p. 61 ) .

“The U. S. flew the U. N. flag in change by reversaling the North Korean invasion of South Korea in 1950 and the invasion of Iraq in 1990. and both misdemeanors were a misdemeanor of the international jurisprudence under the UN charter” ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 63 ) . Goldstein ( 2003 ) notes that it was under Chapter 7 of the Charter that the UN authorized the usage of force to change by reversal Iraq aggression against Kuwait in 1990 ( p. 269 ) .

To the surprise of many. “the United Nations ne’er intervened militarily in similar illegal Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and the Israel invasion of Lebanon in 1982” ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 68 ) . These were clear indicants that the United Nations is limited by the demands of power political relations in the international system. Kochler ( 2002 ) emphasizes that the international system is basically lawless. with the great powers still ruling the international system and the United Nations itself” ( p. 6 )

Purpose of the survey

Merely as the League of Nations grew out of the World War I. the United Nations grew out of the World War II. Like the League of Nations. The United Nations did non basically challenge national sovereignty. it did non change the bing distribution of power among nation-states. and it institutionalized the dominant place of the great powers – specifically the winning powers in the World War II. The United Nations did non derive the monopoly on the legitimate usage of force. which would be necessary to go a universe authorities and to enforce order through superior force and authorization. Therefore. the intent of this survey is to measure the cardinal abilities of the United Nations in prosecuting and accomplishing the rule of corporate security in the international system.

Research Question

The of all time increasing menaces to the province of security in the universe have prompted a stopping point examination on the United Nation’s nucleus map of corporate security. As a modern-day international governmental organisation ( IGO ) . the United Nations surely does non represent a universe authorities with absolute power and authorization to enforce peace on the universe. Yet. this does non intend the United Nations is powerless or undistinguished.

While the United Nations faces legion hurdlings in implementing the international jurisprudence due to the sovereignty statues of provinces and nation-states. the organisation can still act upon the behaviour of provinces and supply forums for communicating and interaction that would be considered more orderly than implied by the construct of lawlessness. Therefore the research inquiry involves a critical expression into the public presentation of the United Nations relation to its chief map of continuing the rule of corporate security in the international system.

Hypothesis

The nucleus empirical research hypothesis of this survey states that the United Nations has non succeeded in continuing the rule of corporate security in the international system.

Significance of the survey

The United Nations Charter is based on consolidative rules that serve as the drive force for the organization’s enterprises. One of the cardinal rules of the United Nations Charter is the acknowledgment of the autonomous equality of all member provinces. As such. all member provinces are considered to be every bit autonomous over their several districts. Each member province has one ballot in the General assembly. yet they are non equal in wealth and power. Furthermore. merely five major powers have lasting seats on the Security Council.

Critics and supporters likewise point out that the United Nations institutionalizes international inequality due to the fact that the Charter is loaded with idealistic rules that bear small resemblance to world. Therefore the survey is important because it will foreground on the many challenges that the United Nations faces in its attempts to continue the rule of corporate security and do appropriate recommendations for turn toing those peculiar challenges.

Research Restrictions

The chief restriction of this survey is lack of sufficient literature sing the jobs that the United Nations brushs while executing its nucleus map of continuing the rule of corporate security. Most of the bing literatures about the United Nations have focused more on the success of the organisation instead than failures.

Definition of footings

For the footing of this survey. the definitions of international dealingss. international system. terrorist act. international organisations and corporate security will be expressed in the simplest footings:

  • International dealingss are the procedures that define the footings of interaction province and non-state histrions relate amongst themselves in the international system.
  • International system refers to a set of relationships among universe provinces. structured harmonizing to certain regulations and forms of interaction. Goldstein ( 2003 ) illustrates that some of these regulations are inexplicit while others are explicit as they determine who is considered a member of the system. what rights and duties members have and what sort of rights and duties occur among provinces.
  • Terrorism refers to a signifier of political force that marks civilians intentionally and randomly. with the purpose of deriving advantage in international bargaining state of affairss. Terrorism normally becomes effectual if it succeeds in damaging the morale of a population and besides when it additions media exposure for the cause.
  • International organisations are organisations involved in politically relevant activities whose rank and activities occur in more than one state.
  • Corporate security is a rule of the UN Charter that advocates for the stria together of the world’s states to halt an aggression against member provinces. Under the rule of corporate security. aggression against one member of the UN is seen as an aggression against all. Chapter 7 of the Charter explicitly authorizes the Security Council to utilize military force against aggression if the usage of non-violent agencies as captured in chapter 6 fail.

Chapter II – Background

Literature Review

The United Nations was founded at the terminal of World War II in 1945 to replace the League of Nations. The formation of the UN became evident after the realisation that the League of Nations had failed miserably. Mesler ( 1997 ) acknowledges that the failure of the League of Nations was precipitated by the deficiency of equal power and authorization. instability in the international system and the involuntariness of the US Senate to sign the pact that formed the conference ( p. 11 ) .

However. the implicit in rules that led to the formation of the United Nations are synonymous with those that governed the formation of the League of Nations. Unlike the League of Nations which lacked the backup of the US Senate. the United Nations received the overpowering indorsement and backup of both the US Senate and President.

As an international governmental organisation ( IGO ) . the foundation and significance of the United Nations is best demonstrated by the theory of pragmatism. “According to the theory of pragmatism. there is no universe authorities. or political authorization above the province. therefore the international system is basically lawless without any overarching political organic structure capable of enforcing jurisprudence and order in the behaviour of its members or nation-states” ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 19 ) . The theory stresses on the centrality of the province. or nation-state. as the supreme political authorization in universe political relations.

The theory of pragmatism is based on the premise that the overruling motivation of all provinces is self-preservation through maximization of power. a state of affairs that transforms the international system to a inactive province of a war of all against all. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) note that stableness is best achieved through balance of power. which consequences from uninhibited interaction among provinces. with the most powerful state moving as a balancer ( p. 19 ) .

Harmonizing to Goldstein ( 2003 ) the international dealingss theory of pragmatism recognizes low political relations ( economic and societal affairs ) to be secondary to high political relations ( military and security ) ( p. 265 ) . It is upon this premiss that the United Nations was founded to move as the over-arching political organic structure to enforce jurisprudence and order on the behaviour. In kernel. the United Nations would implement peace by handling aggression against one as an aggression against all and jointly get the better ofing the wrongdoer.

The formation of the United Nations is farther favored by the international dealingss theory of idealism. The theory of idealism is based on Immanuel Kant’s philosophical theory that focuses on the concerted capacity of human existences instead than their selfishness and lecherousness for power. “In his book titledAgeless Peace. Immanuel Kant argued that merely as the consensual constitution of authorities brings order and domestic repose to people within provinces. so does the constitution of a universe Congress among republican provinces in conveying ageless peace to the universe by and large. therefore stoping the war for all time” ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 39 ) .

Kant believed that a Pacific brotherhood would necessitate to be made up of republican provinces based on representative authoritiess. for when the people themselves instead than princes could make up one’s mind whether or non to travel to war. they would constantly avoid it. for it is they who must bear all the loads of warfare. These republican authoritiess would set up a universe Congress to settle differences and avoid the potency for violent struggle. “Kant finally laid the philosophical basis non merely for the modern-day theory of idealism. but besides its matching institutionalization in the signifier of international governmental organisations ( IGOs ) like the United Nations ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 40 ) .

However. the two theories of pragmatism and liberalism are aggressively contrasted by the theory of liberalism. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) note that in the international system. liberalism theory recognizes province penchants as opposed to province capablenesss. to be the primary determiners of province behaviour ( p. 44 ) .

Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) point out that unlike the theory of pragmatism where the province is seen as a unitary histrion. liberalism advocates for plurality of province actions ( p. 45 ) . The liberalism theory farther provinces that interaction among provinces is non limited to high political relations ( military and security ) . but stretches farther to low political relations ( economic and societal affairs ) . Therefore. this state of affairs eliminates the lawless state of affairs in the international system as provinces gain plentifulness of chances for interaction through broader economic and cultural cooperation.

Although the pragmatism and liberalism theories project different statements refering the founding doctrines of international organisations. both theories acknowledge the demand for enduring peace and security in the international system. The spirit of peace and security is what motivated the initiation of the United Nations. The organisation was founded with the chief aim of keeping international peace and security through peaceable colony of differences. The United Nations is farther entrusted with the undertaking of advancing economic and societal co-operation. in portion through audience with non-governmental organisations every bit good as the publicity of human rights for populations throughout the universe.

“The United Nations Charter is based on the rule that provinces are equal under international jurisprudence ; provinces have full sovereignty over their ain personal businesss ; that provinces should hold full independency and territorial unity ; and provinces should transport out their international duties that include esteeming diplomatic privileges. forbearing from perpetrating aggression. and detecting the footings of the pacts they sign” ( Goldstein. 2003. p. 206 ) . The Charter besides lays out the construction of the United Nations and the methods by which it operates. Harmonizing to the United Nations web site. the construction of the United Nations consists of the General Assembly. the Security Council. Economic and Social Council ( ECOSOC ) . Trusteeship Council. Secretariat. and the International Court of Justice.

The secretariat is headed by the Secretary General and is chiefly the bureaucratic wing of the United Nations. The Secretary General serves for a upper limit of two 5 twelvemonth footings. The international Court of Justice is headquartered in Hague. Netherlands. and serves as the chief judicial organ of the United Nations.

It consists of 15 Judgess elected by the General Assembly and Security Council for nine-year footings and each one of them must be from a different province. While the determinations of the international Court of Justice are officially adhering. it possesses no mechanisms of enforcement. The Economic and Social Council ( ECOSOC ) coordinates the United Nation’s assorted specialized bureaus while the Trusteeship Council was set up to supervise the disposal of trust territories.

Weiss & A ; Dhows ( 2007 ) point out that the General assembly and the Security Council are the most of import variety meats that handle issues that concern the rule of corporate security ( p. 149 ) . The general assembly is the lone organ in which every member province is represented. with each province holding precisely one ballot harmonizing to the spirit of autonomous equality. Linda ( 2003 ) further reveals that the General Assembly chiefly serves as a forum for arguments. reappraisals and scene of docket ( p. 33 ) . However. the enforcement of the determinations made by the General Assembly is ne’er guaranteed despite the fact that the declarations are normally passed by a 2/3 bulk.

The Security Council consists of five lasting members with veto powers. The five lasting members include the United States Britain. Russia. China and France. The Security Council besides consists of 10 other members who are normally proposed by the General Assembly and serve on a 2-year rotary motion footing. The determinations of the Security Council are adhering and enforceable.

Harmonizing to Weiss & A ; Dhows ( 2007 ) . the Security Council deals with corporate security and peacekeeping at the petition of one or more of the parties in struggle. Furthermore. the Security Council has the rights to look into any difference or state of affairs that might endanger international peace and security. and to urge methods of declaration. The Security Council farther negotiates ceasefires and detachments as instruments of struggle declaration. The council is further vested with powers to countenance or authorise the usage of military force to incorporate a struggle.

However. the powers of the Security Council are limited in two ways: foremost. the council’s determinations depends wholly on the involvements of member provinces. therefore the embassadors who represent the provinces can non alter a council declaration without mandate from their several authoritiess ; and 2nd. member provinces frequently try to hedge or soften the effects of adhering declarations made by the Security Council. However. Goldstein ( 2003 ) warns that Security Council declaration can be enforced merely if adequate powerful provinces care about it ( p. 272 ) .

The Security Council runs a formal mechanism for organizing many-sided military action in response to aggression. referred to as the Military Staff Committee. The commission is composed of military officers from the lasting council members. The Military Staff Committee was established under chapter 43 of the United Nations charter.

However. “the commission has ne’er been used due to the fact that the United States opposes the process of puting its forces under non-US commanding officers ( Goldstein. 2003. p. 272 ) . “According to Goldstein ( 2006 ) this is the ground why military forces reacting to aggression under the protections of the Security Council declarations have ever remained under their several national bids. as was the instance during the Gulf War where the U. S. forces undertook the mission of implementing a UN declaration but did non expose UN insignia or flags” ( p. 273 ) .

The Cold war competition between the United States and the Soviet is considered to be one of the biggest challenges that of all time characterized the United Nations Security Council. The competition had split the member states into two blocks. a state of affairs that led to the unneeded usage of veto powers by the United States and the Soviet.

Harmonizing to the Un Committee Report on subscribers. the United Nations is funded through parts from member provinces. Contributions are assessed harmonizing the economic strengths of the member provinces. The United States has ever been the largest subscriber to the United Nations. The United States used to lend 25 % of the UN budget until 1997 when maximal part was reduced to 20 % under the ticker of the so Secretary General Kofi Annan. The poorest bulk of the General Assembly may pay less than 1 % while the 10 wealthiest subscribers pay 75 % of the budget. but cast less 75 of the ballot.

Major subscribers to the regular UN budget for 2006

Member State

Contribution % of entire UN budget

United States 22. 00 %
Japan 19. 47 %
Germany 8. 66 %
United Kingdom 6. 13 %
France 6. 03 %
Italy 4. 89 %
Canada 2. 81 %
Spain 2. 52 %
China 2. 05 %
Mexico 1. 88 %
Australia 1. 59 %
Brazil 1. 52 %

Beginning: World Wide Web. unstats. United Nations. org

The above statistics are representative sample of fiscal parts from UN member states. All member provinces make parts to the UN.

Chapter III – Methods

The proposed survey is based on a pre-post design. significance that public presentation rating was based on events during the Cold War. after the Cold War and the events after the September 11. 2001 terrorist act onslaughts upon the United States. Participants were asked to province their sentiments and answer sentiments on inquiries sing the public presentation of the United Nations relation to its cardinal responsibilities of guaranting corporate security for all member provinces. The survey chiefly consisted of a demographic questionnaire consisting of 15 points that were designed to mensurate the attitudes of the participants refering the functions of the United Nations in keeping planetary peace and security. The survey involved a planar attack of tolerance and stableness.

Tolerance refers to the grade to which the rule of corporate security is accepted as a politically tolerable action ; while stableness refers to domestic and international legitimacy of the rule of corporate security. The demographic questionnaire further consisted of descriptive information of the participants such as age. sex. faith. nationality. gender and race. The survey besides involved comprehensive research from bing literature that was designed to measure the cogency of theories of international dealingss and international jurisprudence to the founding rules of the United Nations.

Data aggregation

Graded random samples were drawn from both on-line college populations and the general populace. followed by simple random trying in each group. The survey employed both theoretical and accessible populations in trying with the purpose of making broad and variable audiences. The sourced studies obtained from participants provided helpful penetrations into the different sentiments and attitudes that different people of different ages. gender. faith. nationalities and races have towards the United Nations relation to the public presentation of its international responsibilities. The population sample targeted bing positions from participants aged 18 twelvemonth and above.

Datas analysis

An analysis of discrepancy was used to mensurate the information. Repeated measurings of informations were used to find and rate different sentiments and attitudes from different participants refering facets of corporate security maps of the United Nations.

Restrictions

Restrictions in the context of this survey refer to the factors which may hold prevented the individuals from take parting or reacting accurately to the questionnaires. The chief restriction of this survey involved geographical restraints. It was hard to affect people from all member provinces of the United Nations given that the UN rank presently stands at more than 200 provinces. There were besides restraints in footings of right reading of the inquiries as many participants did non hold deep cognition and apprehension of international dealingss. Some participants may hold declined to take part wholly because the 15 questionnaire points may hold been excessively much for them.

Chapter IV – Results

The consequences of this survey revealed that every bit much as the United Nations has performed and continues to execute of import functions in international dealingss. the organisation did non populate up to its charge. Since its origin. the United Nations has been dancing to the caprices of the ace powers. and the United States in peculiar. Contrary to outlooks. the United Nations did non basically challenge national sovereignty. it did non change the bing distribution of power among nation-states. and it institutionalized the dominant place of the great powers – specifically the winning powers in the World War II. Harmonizing to Goldstein ( 2003 ) . the United Nations did non derive the monopoly on the legitimate usage of force. which was necessary for it to go a universe authorities with authorization to enforce order through superior usage of force ( p. 270 ) .

The world of equality among provinces in the UN is another issue that raises many concerns among member provinces. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) are concerned that every bit much as the rules of the United Nations recognize the autonomous equality of all member provinces. and that each member province has one ballot in the General assembly is far from the world because member provinces are non equal in wealth and power ( p. 97 ) . Furthermore. merely five major powers have lasting seats on the Security Council. Critics and supporters likewise point out that the United Nations institutionalizes international inequality due to the fact that the Charter is loaded with idealistic rules that bear small resemblance to world.

Chapter V – Discussion

The credibleness of the United Nations has been put to inquiry due to issues environing sovereignty of the establishment. The extent to which the United Nations can exert decisive authorization to stomp order in the jurisprudence and order in the international system remains a conundrum. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) concur that this is ground why the U. S. flew the U. N. flag in change by reversaling the North Korean invasion of South Korea in 1950 and the invasion of Iraq in 1990. and both misdemeanors were a misdemeanor of the international jurisprudence under the UN charter ( p. 116 ) .

However. to the surprise of many. “the United Nations ne’er intervened militarily in similar illegal Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and the Israel invasion of Lebanon in 1982” Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 117 ) . These were clear indicants that the United Nations is limited by the demands of power political relations in the international system. Harmonizing to Kochler ( 2006 ) . the international system is basically lawless. with the great powers still ruling the international system and the United Nations itself ( p. 21 )

Power battles is one of the biggest challenges confronting the United Nations today. Kochler ( 2002 ) notes that like provinces. IGO’s are mostly designed by the dominant powers to function their involvements ( p. 23 ) Kochler ( 2002 ) further notes that while the being of the United Nations is intended to keep universe peace and security. it is a universe peace and security that perpetuates bing power agreements and the economic and political systems that support them ( p. 24 ) . A instance in point is the 1989 invasion of Kuwait by Iraq.

The UN acted when Iraq invaded Kuwait. chiefly because the US was able to rule the Security Council and the invasion threatened to increase universe oil monetary values. This was authoritative power political relations within the pretense of a “new universe order” ( Roberts & A ; Kingsbury. 1994. p. 123 ) . On the other manus. when the United Nations General Assembly issued a close cosmopolitan disapprobation of the U. S. invasion of Panama. the United States ignored the disapprobations and executed the full invasion with small respect to international concerns.

These instances arose as a consequence of the failing apparent in the construction of the United Nations. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) are concerned that the United Nations gives greater enforcement powers to the Security Council than to other organic structures within the organisation. yet the Security Council is dominated by the great powers which merely pursue involvements that are of significance to their states ( p. 128 ) .

The other concern raised in respect to the public presentation of the United Nations is the facet of equality in engagement. In kernel. cooperation does non needfully connote the equality of engagement or involvements. As state of affairss provide. provinces cooperate in establishments that exploit them because they perceive no option. merely as the instance with the UN. which clearly executes its authorization in favour of the involvements of the ace powers while pretermiting the hapless states.

A measure by measure analysis of the UN during and after the Cold War every bit good as after the September 11. 2001 terrorist act onslaughts upon the United States reveals some of the most dismaying failings in the abilities of the United Nations to implement permanent peace and security in the international system.

The United Nations during the Cold War

The period between 1945 and 1955 went down as one of the most hard periods in the history of the United Nations. “Marked by a Cold War deadlock that pitied the United States and the Soviet Union against each other. the UN made really small advancement during this period due to frequent usage of veto powers by the two states ( Mesler. 1997. p. 14 ) .

One of the biggest challenges that the United Nations faced was that of rank enlargement because the US and Soviet exercised their veto powers to forestall the admittance of new provinces perceived to be allied with the other side. Mesler ( 1997 ) reveals that between 1945 and 1955. the UN merely managed to acknowledge 9 new members ( p. 16 ) . However. a 1955 axis trade permitted admittance of 16 new members. 8 on each side and the deadlock was avoided thenceforth through frequent audiences and bargaining. and caucusing.

The United Nations was besides characterized by serious support differences during the Cold War. “In 1956. the Soviet Bloc and several Arab States declined to lend to the United Nations Emergency Force ( UNEF ) that was sent to put up a buffer between Israel and Egypt after the 2nd Arab – Israel war ( Mesler. 1997. p. 19 ) . This war came about when Egypt under Nasser sought to nationalise the British controlled Suez Canal. an action the prompted a declaration of war by Britain. France and Israel.

Goldstein ( 2003 ) acknowledges that during the Cold War. the United Nations had few successes in international security because the U. S. – Soviet struggle prevented consensus ( 2003. p. 269 ) . The United Nations had been relegated to irrelevance in a universe order that had been structured by two opposing confederation blocks. Mesler ( 1997 ) is concerned that although there were few noteworthy exclusions. such as understandings to post peacekeeping forces in the Middle East. the United Nations did non play a cardinal function in work outing international crisis ( p. 31 ) .

The predomination of 3rd universe rank added to the UN woos as they necessitated the displacement of focal point by the UN from security issues to economic and societal jobs of the hapless states. This was contrary to the international dealingss theory of pragmatism which identifies low political relations ( economic and societal affairs ) to be secondary to high political relations ( military and security ) . “Third universe provinces besides used the United Nations as a forum for knocking the rich states in general. with the United States holding been their chief mark ( Goldstein 2003 p. 270 ) .

In the 1950’s and 1960’s. the UN rank doubled as settlements in Africa and Asia gained independency. The enlargement caused alterations in the character of the general Assembly. Harmonizing to Mesler ( 1997 ) . “The concerns of the new members were wholly different from those of the western industrialized states and on many occasions. showed unfastened bitterness to their former colonial Masterss ( p. 31 ) . Furthermore. the 3rd universe provinces became concerned about the overpowering powers and privileges that the United States enjoyed in the UN. Mesler ( 1997 ) further reveals that 3rd universe states were concerned in the mode in which the UN normally became effectual in international security personal businesss when the United States led the attempts.

These concerns led to the outgrowth of rifts between the United States and the 3rd universe states. and accordingly. the United States found itself on the minority on many issues. By 1980’s when the force per unit area from the 3rd universe states became intolerable. the United States reacted by keep backing their fiscal parts to the United Nations. Harmonizing to Mesler ( 1997 ) . the non payment of U. S dues rose to more than $ 1 billion and was later followed by the backdown of rank from the UNESCO ( p. 33 ) .

However. it must be noted that the UN registered rather some noteworthy success in the late 1980’s merely before the terminal of the Cold war. Mesler ( 1997 ) acknowledges that the UN successfully brought to an terminal several regional struggles that included the 1988 Iraq – Iran war and the Cardinal American crisis ( p. 39 ) . The UN successfully engineered ceasefire dialogues among the parties and provided peacekeeping forces that monitored the executions of the ceasefire understandings.

The United Nations after the Cold War

The terminal of the Cold War marked the terminal of bipolar alliances in the international system and paved manner to a many-sided order. This led to more flexible dealingss among provinces in the international system and therefore great powers could eventually hold on different issues sing the international security. The terminal of the Cold War farther brought to a arrest the tendency that the 3rd universe had deployed in playing off the ace powers against each other.

Harmonizing to Mesler ( 1997 ) . greater cooperation emerged between the United States and the once hostile 3rd universe states. a state of affairs that moved the UN to the centre phase of international dealingss ( p. 38 ) . However. the United Nations still faced challenges that fundamentally related to the thrust for power by the state that emerged as the planetary hegemon from the power battle of the Cold War. in this instance. the United States of America.

By the early 1990’s. the United Nations had successfully asserted its place as the world’s most of import tool for settling international struggles. Harmonizing to an analysis provided by Goldstein ( 2003 ) in 1993. Security Council declarations had increased to 78 from 15 in 1987 ; peacekeeping missions had risen to 17 from 5 in 1987 ; peacekeepers had risen to 78. 000 from 12. 000 in 1987 ; and states directing military personnels had risen to 76 from 26 in 1987 ( p. 269 ) . Furthermore. the UN oversaw the independency of Namibia from South Africa and the country’s foremost free elections in 1990.

However. the UN faced legion dashing challenges during the post-Cold War period. Mesler ( 1997 ) identifies the job of unequal support that was occasioned by the non-payment of dues by the United States to hold been one of the biggest challenges that the United Nations faced during the station Cold War period ( p. 42 ) . “The UN woos during the post-Cold War period were farther worsened by the failure of the United States to honour its fiscal duties to the organisation Mesler” ( p. 42 ) .

The United States failed to pay its dues for many old ages. mentioning budgetary embezzlement by the UN as their chief concern. The US Congress demanded the shrinkage of UN budgets and cutting down of staff occupations before approving the allotment of financess to the UN. The US Congress farther delayed corroborating the new US embassador to the UN. Richard Holbrook. go forthing the place vacant for a twelvemonth. These peculiar free-riding inclinations by the US presented the UN with troubles in presenting its nucleus maps of corporate security and duty.

Another station Cold War pull back occurred in Angola. where. upon directing merely a few peacekeepers to help in the griping up of security during the 1992 elections. snake pit broke loose and Rebels took up weaponries after the authorities won in the internationally ascertained elections. The UN was wholly overwhelmed and could non incorporate the Rebels. “In Cambodia. the Khmer Rouge cabal refused to demilitarize harmonizing to the UN brokered peace program it had signed. a procedure that was later overtaken by events after a putsch that interrupted Cambodia’s passage to democracy” ( Mesler 1997. p. 51 ) .

Mesler ( 1997 ) identifies Yugoslavia as the other topographic point where the UN faced serious draw dorsums even after set abouting the largest peacekeeping mission of about 40. 000 foreign military personnels bing $ 1 billion yearly from 1993 and 1995 ( P. 51 ) . “The mission was highly incapacitated by the discrepancy that emerged between the type of forces sent ( lightly armed forces equipped for human-centered operations ) and the state of affairs on the land which was a full graduated table territorial aggression by to a great extent armed forces ( Mesler. 1997. p. 52 ) . This unhappy combination came to be known as “peacekeeping where there was no peace to maintain. ”

Mesler ( 1997 ) notes that in response to the jobs of inefficiency and fiscal troubles. the UN scaled back its peacekeeping military personnels from 78. 000 in 1995 to 19. 000 in 1997. and farther carried out staff decrease and reforms in the UN secretariat and UN plans ( p. 53 ) .

UN during the Post 9/11

The September 11. 2001 terrorist onslaughts upon the United States marked a turning point in the history of the United Nations. The US significantly increased its engagement in the United Nations. and a decisive alliance of member provinces endorsed US war on terrorist act. However. there are increased concerns throughout the universe that the United States has hijacked the whole procedure to progress its ain national involvements at the disbursal of other provinces. The United Nations has been pushed to the fringe by the United States in the war on terrorist act.

The foreign policy steps adopted by the United States after the September 11terrorism onslaughts are a clear invasion of the international jurisprudence. The United States has masterminded the outgrowth of a new geo-strategic state of affairs in the international system that has efficaciously reduced the United Nations to a mere gum elastic stomping authorization. As the lone hegemony. the United States has taken full advantage of its dominant position usurp the functions of the United Nations.

“The United States claims supreme authorization for all steps related to the on-going anti-terrorism runs and does non accept impersonal supreme authorities – such as the UN – in finding of the existent terrorist act menaces ” ( Kochler. 2002. p. 4 ) . Harmonizing to Kochler ( 2002 ) the United Nations has so been pushed to the out of boundss and can non move any longer harmonizing to the Charter’s philosophy of corporate security. which since the terminal of World War II was and still ought to be the nucleus component of many-sided international order represented – or advocated. to be more realistic by the universe organic structure ( p. 9 ) .

Kochler ( 2002 ) asserts that by claiming itself the right to move on behalf of the international community. the United States violates the rules that were established under the United Nations Charter which are entirely reserved for the Security Council and can merely be invoked in conformance with the ordinances of Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter ( p. 11 ) .

In its chases on the war on panic. the United States with the backup of its western Alliess attacked Afghanistan in October 2001. However. the onslaught did non have the full backup of the United Nations Security Council. Therefore. despite the broad runing support for the echt class and concerns of the United States. it is of import for operations of such magnitude to set about purely under the full authorization of the United Nations.

The other case during which the United States undermined the authorization of the United Nations was the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Although the Iraq invasion was good intended to free the universe of the dangers posed by arms of mass devastation and terrorist act. one time once more the United States did non seek the full blessing of the UN Security Council. The war in Iraq has ended up being excessively lay waste toing. claiming lives of 1000s of Iraqi citizens and military forces of the US and its Alliess. A critical analysis of the Iraq war relation to the rational theoretical account of war reveals a large spread between the good achieved and the immorality that has been entrenched by the war. It is apparent that the Iraq struggle could hold been handled efficaciously by the United Nations through non-violent agencies as provided for by the chapter 6 of the Charter.

The US war on terrorist act is run on a platform of preventative war. “The construct of preventative war as advanced in the new strategic philosophy of the United States is by all agencies incompatible with the United Nations Charter because the Charter explicitly and unambiguously prohibitions use of force in all signifiers in the international system except in instances of self-defence or by manner of chapter 7 of the UN Charter upon full blessing of the Security council” Kochler. 2002. p. 12 ) .

Kouchler ( 2002 ) further demonstrates his concerns by saying that under the present fortunes. national sovereignty – though guaranteed by the United Nations Charter – has been reduced to a state’s freedom to place vis-a-vis the lone world power. with the option of either fall ining the “forces of evil” or opposing them. without any rights to take part in the finding of what is evil. Therefore. the United States has successfully entrenched its ain strategic dockets in different parts of the universe under the pretense of counter-terrorism war ( p. 21 ) . Kouchler identifies the control over specific geopolitical parts and strategic natural resources to be among the cardinal docket of the US policies that are being implemented under the on-going war on panic.

The US war on panic has obviously taken heavy toll on peace and security in the full international system. Apart from sabotaging the rule of corporate security as espoused by the United Nations Charter. the counter-terrorism war has been damaging to the rule of sovereignty and equality of provinces in the international system. Furthermore. single human rights and cardinal freedoms of citizens throughout the universe have been curtailed due to the of all time increasing menaces of retaliatory onslaughts from terrorists.

Furthermore. citizens of states under US military invasion have frequently become victims of indiscriminate usage of force. The US war on panic further aggravates internal tensenesss. ignites cultural competitions and deepens bing societal jobs in independent provinces that should otherwise bask the sovereignty and equal say in the international system. The United Nations has perfectly been dominated and eclipsed by the United States during the station September 11. 2001 period.

Chapter VI – Conclusion

There exists a consensus among many provinces that the United Nations provides the best planetary forum for discoursing general many-sided issues. States gain purchase by utilizing the UN to seek more good results in struggles. Harmonizing to the United Nations web site. the UN provides international stableness ; acts as a representative symbol of planetary individuality ; provides a forum where provinces promote their positions and show their differences ; and provides mechanisms for struggle declarations in international security personal businesss. No individual state in this universe can sufficiently execute all these functions to the degrees that the United Nations does.

In legion fortunes nevertheless. the United Nations has been referred to as a “toothless Canis familiaris that merely barks but can non bite” due to its continued inability to implement jurisprudence and order in international dealingss. Linda ( 2003 ) asserts that despite these accusals. many of the failures of the United Nations occurred as a consequence of battles among external forces instead than the organisations ain failure ( p. 74 ) . Linda ( 2003 ) cites the competition between the US and Soviet axis as holding been one of the biggest hindrances in the UN during the Cold War ( p. 74 ) .

The United States and the Soviet applied their veto powers to barricade any determinations that were non in their favour. Furthermore. the 3rd universe states maximized on the failings created by the Cold War competitions to prosecute their ain selfish involvements which were focused on economic and societal involvements. Therefore. the rule of corporate security became secondary to other involvements that were being pursued by both the developed and developing states. Linda ( 2003 ) acknowledges that without equal support from member states. it became impossible for the United Nations to prosecute the docket of corporate security ( p. 76 ) .

While the United Nations performed exceptionally good during the station Cold War epoch. its operations were badly affected by jobs of unequal support. The organisation was peculiarly affected by non-payment of dues by the United States. The station September 11 period has seen the United Nations being wholly overshadowed by the US in the war against panic. Kochler ( 2002 ) warns that “with the US war on terrorist act holding claimed so many lives right from its origin to day of the month. there is an pressing demand for alteration of tactic” ( p. 31 ) . Harmonizing to Kochler ( 2002 ) the United Nations needs to repossess its rightful place as the planetary authorization vested with powers to implement peace and saneness in the international system ( . p. 32 ) .

Therefore. there is an pressing demand for powerful states to give the United Nations its due acknowledgment as the universe security and peacekeeping organic structure. States such as the United States must larn to prosecute their involvements within the model of chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter. Kochler ( 2002 ) further warns that the arbitrary onslaughts on other states without the blessing of the Security Council defeat the intent and spirit of corporate security as a whole ( p. 33 ) . Such onslaughts and invasions merely serve to split the universe even further along ideological. spiritual and economic lines.

In order to accomplish sustainable peace and security throughout the universe. it must be acknowledged that “the United Nations does non be because it has powers to coerce its will on the world’s provinces ; instead. it exists because provinces founded it to function their needs” ( Goldstein. 2006. p. 265 ) . The United Nations should no longer be taken for granted. Although the international dealingss are still characterized by lawlessness. the United Nations is the closest signifier of universe authorities that the international system has of all time cherished.

Therefore. attempts must be harnessed to give the United Nations due acknowledgment. greater fiscal capacity and more political powers to move on behalf of provinces in furthering universe security and international dealingss. Goldstein contends that the United Nations farther acts as a purchase for chairing costs of accomplishing corporate security. because UN dues and disbursals of diplomatic representatives in add-on to the understanding to act in conformity with the Charter supply a cost effectual avenue compared to the costs that single states would incur to accomplish the same aims ( p. 266 ) .

While the United Nations can function as a forum for international cooperation. much can be achieved merely if high happenstances of involvements occur so that more understandings can be reached and implemented. Sing the fact that member provinces retain their full sovereignty position. binding determinations require cooperation and consensus instead than bulk ballots. Furthermore. there is pressing demand for an inspection and repair of the UN structures so as to extinguish the bing power spreads among member provinces.

This follows concerns to the consequence that the United Nations gives greater enforcement powers to the Security Council than to other organic structures within the organisation. yet the Security Council is dominated by the great powers which merely pursue involvements that are of significance to their states. Roberts & A ; Kingsbury ( 1994 ) are categorical that more power should be transferred from the Security Council to the General Assembly where provinces receive equal acknowledgment and vote rights ( p. 134 ) . The Security Council should besides be expanded with the aim of administering power equally among member provinces every bit good within all the variety meats of the United Nations.

Although the chief aim that motivated the foundation of the United Nations was the proviso of international security through bar of war. the other services being provided by the organisation should ne’er be ignored or pushed to the background. There are many jobs which are planetary in nature that rely on the United Nations. Harmonizing to Goldstein ( 2003 ) globalisation has bit by bit transformed the universe into a individual economic system. therefore transnational corporations are relocating from one state to another and edifice subordinates in several other countries” ( P. 112 ) . Subsequently the universe has become more mutualist. with engineering holding transformed communicating to instantaneous degrees.

All these developments have introduced new challenges and conditions in the international system that no individual state can absorb all the force per unit area presented by such challenges and conditions. These conditions and challenges are presented in the signifier of population growing. healthcare issues like HIV-AIDS. environmental issues like planetary heating. drug trafficking and terrorist act. Therefore. war should non be the lone international quandary for the United Nations. However. it may be that the United Nations remains excessively institutionally undeveloped. missing independent authorization and resources. to efficaciously cover with any of these jobs.

Reference List

Goldstein. J. ( 2003 ) .International Relationss. Pearson Education. Inc. .

Kochler. H. ( 2002 ) International oecumenic conference:The war on panic. its impact on

sovereignty of provinces. and its deductions for human rights and civil autonomies.

Linda. F. ( 2003 ) .An Insider’s Guide to the UN. Yale University Press.

Mesler. S. ( 1997 ) .United Nations: The First Fifty Years. Atlantic Monthly Press.

Pilar P. R. ( 2001 ) .Terrorism and U. S. Foreign Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution

Imperativeness

Roberts. A. & A ; Kingsbury. B. ( Eds. ) . ( 1994 ) .United Nations. Divided Universe: The UN’s

Role in International Relations. 2neodymiumErectile dysfunction

The United Nations:Charter of the United Nations. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. un. org/aboutun/charter/index. html/ on 25/03/2008

The United Nations.The United Nations: Organization. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. un. org/aboutun/basicfacts/unorg. htm/ on 25/03/2008

The United Nations. ( 2006 ) .Report on the commission on parts.Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. un. org/Depts/dpko/contributors/N0642856. pdf? Open & A ; DS=A/61/11 & A ; Lang=E

on 26/05/2008

Weiss G. T. & A ; Dhows. S. ( Eds. ) . ( 2007 ) .The Oxford Handbook on United Nations. Oxford

University Press.

x

Hi!
I'm Larry

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out