Family Systems theory Essay

Why survey households?

•Traditional psychological science – job an single 1

– Externalise hurt – act out

– Internalise hurt – withdraw

Theorists

– Psychoanalytic – e. g Freud – fixated at a stage due to trauma and regress to this degree

– Behaviorists – e. g learn inappropriate response

– Attachment – insecure primary fond regard

•Sociological position

Bronfenbrenner’s theoretical account – ecological attack

a ) Life rhythm emphasiss

B ) Stresses related to cultural outlooks

degree Celsius ) Stresses related to historical clip

vitamin D ) Random destiny

vitamin E ) Stress reactions which create more emphasis

Does research back up the sociological point of view?

Yes
– Distress related to deficiency of societal support

– Overcrowded lodging. male parent in jail. depressed female parent

– Parental emphasis & A ; maternal negativeness plus child disposition

– Poverty

What is family’s place in the sociological theoretical account?

– most influential portion of child’s societal context

– buffer between kid and outside universe – serves to protect or expose kid

– normally positive

Make households necessitate support?

– Bronfenbrenner’s theoretical account less applicable now?

– Less sense of community

– Increased atomization

How do households work?

Can be seen as a system – emphasis – & gt ; hurt

– kid most likely to be the hard-pressed individual as most powerless

Basic premises

Circulatory causing – synergistic theoretical account

Non-summativity – whole more than amount of parts

Communication – feeling and content

Governed by regulations – spoken or understood

Homeostasis – in some kind of balance

Morphogenesis – flexibleness to react to alter

How make you mensurate household relationships?

Research relies on two dimensions

– Affection ( aka heat. credence. coherence. intimacy )

Disengaged————-OK—————-Enmeshed
Credence

– Control ( aka power. liberty. flexibleness )

Neglect——————-OK—————–Rigid
Autonomy

What happens when households get stressed?

Timberlawn surveies ( Walsh 1993 )

Optimum households

•Strong. warm relationships particularly matrimonial one
•See causes and effects as circulatory
•See events as multi-causative.
•Actively involved in universe outside household
•Negotiate efficaciously
•Feelings and ideas expressed and accepted
•Little incrimination or personal onslaught
•See human nature as benign – do best in a state of affairs
•Flexible – adjust to new state of affairss







Adequate FAMILIES

Seek control instead than familiarity

•Centripetal

Rule edge
Enmeshed
Power conflicts
Scapegoating
Severe – eg religious orders
•Centrifugal




More comfy with negative feelings
Blame and onslaught
Children expected to be independent early
Material wealth takes penchant over relationships
Extreme – helter-skelter. intimidating. really unstable



How can early childhood pedagogues assist?

Recognise troubles
Emotionally back uping
Mentioning on
Information
Helping with kids if in crisis



x

Hi!
I'm Larry

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out