Suppose Wal-Mart has announced programs to seek blessing from the be aftering committee of a little town to construct a new shop. Develop a list of the chief statements. pro and con. that could be presented at a public hearing on the affair by members of each of these two groups: 1. Owners of little concerns located nearby. 2. Town occupants. and occupants of nearby towns. How might a Wal-Mart representative respond to the negative unfavorable judgments that might be brought up. and what other benefits could the representative offer the be aftering board to bolster Wal-Mart’s instance for deriving the board’s blessing?
Owners of little concern – Con’s we don’t want Wal-Mart in our town Because of the size of Wal-Mart they are able to take down monetary values low plenty to drive ma & A ; pop concerns out of concern. This will turn. what is a once a hustling little rural town into a shade town. Local citizens who pay revenue enhancements and store and live within the community own the little concerns that make up a community. This keeps the money both spent and earned in the community. If a Wal-Mart is allowed to come in and vie. they will drive these local concern out of concern and Wal-Mart net incomes will be shipped out of the county and out of province. Harmonizing to Freeman ( 2003 ) “This is accomplished through Wal-Mart’s policy of paying workers below subsistence rewards. and importing goods that have been produced under slave-labor conditions overseas. ” Do we truly want to supply Wal-Mart the chance to come into our community and destruct what has been established over decennaries of traditional household concerns.
Pro’s – Wal-Mart is good for concern It is true that when Wal-Mart moves into community concerns shut down. There have been many docudramas demoing the empty edifices and the many closed stores downtown. What they haven’t shown are the concerns that fill those empty stores finally. In their publication Sobel and Dean point out that it is a rule of originative devastation when a more efficient system moves in the less efficient are destroyed.
So when a Wal-Mart moves into town the local frock store closes but in its topographic point a high-end eating house move into that downtown infinite. Because Wal-Mart can do and sell frocks more expeditiously the frock store is destroyed but now there is available resource freed up. Before the eating house couldn’t afford to travel into business district. The terminal consequence is local clients can purchase frocks for less and hold money left over to eat at the eating house. Nothing has been destroyed but has been reorganized in a more efficient system. The terminal consequence is higher quality of life for everyone.